About Us

Tuckner, Sipser, Weinstock & Sipser, LLP is a progressive New York City law firm dedicated to the empowerment of women in the workplace. We represent individuals experiencing all forms of workplace discrimination, specifically those affecting women, including sexual harassment, equal pay, pregnancy discrimination and family and medical leave act violations.

(Homo)Sex and the City


By Lauren Tetenbaum
Last week, New York Governor David Paterson directed all state agencies to revise their policies and regulations to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions. It’s about time New York made such a stride.

As a native Manhattanite, New York State laws frequently strike me as bizarre. From the race-biased Rockefeller drug laws to the anachronistic lack of no-fault divorce (more on that later), State laws often do not reflect the more liberal politics and ways of life of New York City. The fact that same-sex unions were not recognized at all in New York until Governor Paterson’s May 14, 2008 directive boggles my mind.

Call me super-liberal (I’ll probably admit to that), but I have never understood how “pro-family advocates” (i.e., anti-gay rights advocates) could possibly justify prohibiting gay marriage. People are people. How can a person correctly say that certain people deserve fewer rights than others, just because of their sexual orientation? To emphasize, we live in a country that separates (or is supposed to) church and state. Religious beliefs about “man and wife” should not bear any relation to state laws regarding access to all—unlimited—spousal rights. I believe that there should not even be distinct terms, as “separate but equal” clearly does not give rise to full equality.

When I was a sophomore at the University of Pennsylvania, I conducted research for a women’s law course and wrote an angry paper about the sad state of our country’s gay marriage laws. I compared the United States to the progressive laws of the Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada (see full paper attached). In the five years since I wrote this paper, the US has had some, but too little, change in this area. California recently joined Massachusetts as the only states in which same-sex couples can obtain a marriage (in Vermont, homosexuals can enter civil unions, which give the same benefits as heterosexual marriage under this different term).

Now New York will finally recognize these marriages. This is a long-awaited step in the right direction. However, as Empire State Pride Agenda’s executive director Alan Van Capelle said in the New York Times article, “[This] is a temporary but necessary fix for a longer-term problem, which is marriage equality in New York State.” There is room for improvement, New Yorkers. Let’s change the law and be the trendsetter everyone believes New York to be.

If you want to show your encouragement for this new NY regulation, please call Governor Paterson’s phone line at (518) 474-8390 between normal business hours, give your zip code, and say: “I support the directive supporting same-sex marriage!”

Share Women\'s Rights Blog: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Every breath you take : Jack Tuckner on How to Respond to a Complaint


The following article has been published in May issue of First Line Magazine:

By Portia Stewart, Editor, FirstLine


He’s watching you. You can’t concentrate, you’re afraid to be alone with him, and the comments won’t stop. Sexual harassment can be relentless, consuming your work and your life. It happened to these women—and it could happen to you. Here’s what every woman (and man) should know about sexual harassment.

She was alone in the dark room when it happened. The lights were off, but she could feel him behind her, a presence standing close in the darkness. Anna paused in the midst of popping the X-ray film from the cassette. She felt the heat rush to her face and the slow cascade of sweat tracing a line down the back of her neck. He was close, so close, and he wanted her to know it. “Oh my God,” she thought. “What am I going to do?” She heard him chuckle before he leaned forward, grinding the front of his body against her back. “You know you like it,” he said, laughing. Too scared to scream. Embarrassed. Ashamed. If she did, the other technicians would know. What would they think? She was young, new, vulnerable. He knew it. Her stomach rolled with the sensation of his body pressing against her own. She whirled and kicked him in the crotch. He laughed again and stepped back. Then he left the room. Anna’s experience may sound extreme, but it’s not as unusual as you might think. About one-third of veterinary team members say they’ve experienced sexual harassment at work, according to a 2007 VetMedTeam.com survey. And it’s not surprising. Ninety-five percent of team members are women, according to 2007 Firstline research, and women are much more likely to experience sexual harassment than men. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported males fled only 16 percent of the 12,510 complaints in fiscal year 2007.

Traditionally, veterinarians and practice owners have been male, and 2007 market research from the American Veterinary Medical Association shows 53.5 percent of veterinarians in private clinical practice are male. This demonstrates the pattern experts often see in sexual harassment cases: Women are more likely to face sexual harassment when they enter a male-dominated profession, according to research published in the March 2007 issue of the Journal of Applied Psychology.

Can you protect yourself? Some-times. Our experts agree these cases can happen to almost anyone, but you can decrease your risk—and learn how to correctly handle any experience you face. Consider these true stories from readers like you and advice from legal and human resources experts.

When harassment gets physical
Like many cases of sexual harassment, Anna’s experience didn’t begin—or end—with the confrontation in the dark room. She knew she had a problem from almost the first day she started her job. As a veterinary technology student, Anna was excited about the chance to work at a progressive practice in Chicago. The doctors and technicians were highly qualified and well-respected, and the pay was great. Dr. Smith was sharp-tongued and demanding, but Anna was eager to learn. That’s why she and her co-workers often ignored the jokes he made about his sexual history, even though the comments made them uncomfortable. But the afternoon with Dr. Smith in the dark room marked a turning point. Anna faced a difficult decision: stay or leave. She was newly married and attending school, and every time she considered quitting, visions of her rent and school bills rose up to haunt her. She told herself she wouldn’t give up, she wouldn’t quit. And there was no one to go to—he was the practice owner, the boss. Besides, a job as a clerk at a fast food restaurant wouldn’t pay as much, and she’d be leaving a field she loved and a chance to learn from one of the most skilled veterinary teams in her area. She decided to stick it out. That is, until she discovered she was pregnant. The day she announced her pregnancy to Dr. Smith, he berated her, calling her names and telling her she was useless. He assigned her the most menial task, labeling pill bottles. Then, in a turnabout, he confronted her again that afternoon and sent her home, telling her not to come back until she had a doctor’s note specifying which tasks she could perform—including whether she could work on the computer, a task he sarcastically told her he doubted she could perform because it might hurt the baby. Anna spent that afternoon in her OB/GYN’s office. Tearfully, she explained the situation to her medical doctor, who told Anna she couldn’t go back to work. The situation was so stressful her physician feared Anna was at risk of losing her baby. That afternoon, she began vomiting. Later that evening, her husband raced her to the emergency room. Anna was dehydrated and exhausted. Doctors put her on bed rest for the remainder of her pregnancy, and she never returned to work. Six months later, Anna gave birth to a healthy baby boy. Throughout her employment with Dr. Smith, Anna experienced physical and emotional reactions to the harassment. She suffered from stress rosacea for the first—and only—time in her life. And she began to experience irritable bowel disorder, a symptom she continues to suffer from today.

Anna’s complaints aren’t uncommon. People who’ve suffered from sexual harassment report a range of physical and psychological effects, including depression, anxiety and panic attacks, shame and guilt, headaches, and gastrointestinal disorders. In fact, research reported in a 1993 issue of the Journal of Vocational Behavior suggests sexual harassment may even lead to a mental illness called post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Most commonly linked to traumatic assaults, disasters, accidents, or military combat, PTSD sufferers may exhibit symptoms including irritability or emotional numbness and even display aggressive or violent behavior. They also may suffer from flashbacks, where they relive the traumatic event again and again. And women are more susceptible to the condition than men, according to the National Institute of Mental Health.

The sleazy vendor
One day Carol, a practice manager, noticed a group of technicians clustered in the practice lounge. They were whispering and looking worried. Concerned, Carol asked what was going on. They told her Bob, a vendor, was visiting the practice, and they were hiding Sally, a technician. They explained that Bob had been asking Sally out on dates for the last six months. Although she always refused him, he continued to pursue her, leaving notes on her car and making sexually explicit comments.
Carol found Sally and confirmed the complaints. Sally told Carol she was afraid of Bob, but she hadn’t said anything because she didn’t want to cause trouble and Bob might get mad. Sally’s comments launched Carol into action. She pulled out the practice’s sexual harassment policy and reviewed it with Sally and the rest of the team. Then she called Bob’s supervisor and told him about Bob’s inappropriate behavior. Bob’s supervisor sent him to sexual harassment training, and Bob was only allowed to return to the practice when Sally felt comfortable again and gave her permission.
Since then, Carol has given a special focus to the issue. She’s confronted a few clients who’ve behaved inappropriately with team members and even fired two clients for harassment. She’s also focused on training her front office team members to encourage professional behavior and eliminate any confusing messages clients might misconstrue.
Small and mid-sized businesses may avoid creating a sexual harassment policy because these employers believe it might encourage complaints, according to a 1998 Commerce Clearinghouse report. But Caren Goldberg, a management professor with Kogod School of Business at American University in Washington, D.C., says that may not be true. She recently completed research that shows harassment training doesn’t encourage lawsuits. Her advice to small business employers: Post your policy visibly.
“This may be an effective approach to remind potential offenders that they’re expected to behave appropriately,” Goldberg says. “It also reminds potential victims that they have a right to a workplace free from harassment.”
There are indications, she says, that sexual harassment is about power. So characteristics and behaviors, like being a female in a subordinate position or avoiding conflict, might increase your risk of being targeted. “You may be able to minimize your risk by demonstrating power,” Goldberg says. “For example, if someone makes an inappropriate remark, simply saying, ‘that’s inappropriate’ may make the offender think twice before repeating the behavior.
“As awkward as it may feel for victims, they are more likely to end the harassment by confronting the harasser directly. If that isn’t effective, they should formally report the behavior and give their employer a chance to address the problem.”

How to answer a complaint
Employment attorney Jack Tuckner offers this quick guide for employers about how to respond when an employee complains of sexual harassment.

1. Thank the employee for the complaint: You might add, “We take these claims very seriously, and we’re an equal opportunity employer. We’ll investigate this situation, and please let us know if there’s anything we can do to make you more comfortable as we look into this. We’ll strive to keep this confidential, and we will not retaliate against you because of this complaint.”

2. Consult your human resource and legal consultants: You need to conduct an investigation, which will include interviewing the alleged harasser and the person lodging the complaint. Your attorney can offer the best advice to handle this situation appropriately.

3. Consider offering paid administrative leave for the complainant: This ensures there will be no more confrontations while you’re investigating the complaint. It’s also a nice gesture to offer to pay for counseling for the complainant.

4. Reach a conclusion: At the end of the investigation, you must reach a conclusion. If you determine that the employee was discriminated against, you must launch corrective action, from monitoring to firing the perpetrator, depending on the situation.
Finally, if you haven’t already, make sure you address sexual harassment in your employee manual: Explain that you’re an equal opportunity employer and list the protected classes. This policy should also explain how to complain and who the employee should approach with the complaint.

The foul-mouthed client
It started with a few sexual comments. Lisa, a receptionist, was proud of the 50 pounds she’d lost, and clients began to notice as well. The women all wanted to know how she’d done it, but a few of the male clients had a different response. As Lisa’s weight changed and her clothes began to ft better, the comments began. Most were little compliments and some were clearly sexual.
At first, Lisa wasn’t sure how to respond. As a receptionist, she knows a warm, friendly greeting at the front desk is important to a practice’s success. But she was uncomfortable. She reached the breaking point when one client we’ll call Joe took it to the next level. A firm believer in good eye contact, Lisa was watching Joe leave the practice when she saw him make a rude gesture with his tongue. Appalled, Lisa told her co-workers, who scoffed at her.

A few weeks later, Joe returned. Noticing him in the parking lot, Lisa ducked into the back of the practice. Undeterred, Joe started down the hall to look for her. Joe announced he was there to tell her some jokes. Lisa came to the front armed with an 8-pound bag of cat food across her front as a shield. Joe sidled up so close he rubbed her shoulder. And after every punch line he’d give her a little squeeze around the waist. Lisa was so flustered, she didn’t even hear the second joke. She was upset for the rest of the day and longed for a hot shower to wash away the bad feelings.

Until that point, her weight loss seemed like a blessing. Now she was ready to do anything to attract less attention. Was it her fault, she asked herself? Did she deserve it? Sure she was friendly and chatty, but wasn’t that her job?

When she first mentioned the male clients’ comments about how hot and sexy she looked, her boyfriend told her to take it as a compliment. After the incident with Joe, he became concerned, and he encouraged Lisa to talk to her boss.

Like so many women who suffer harassment, in the end Lisa said nothing. She wasn’t sure her boss would take her seriously. She couldn’t imagine her doctor confronting Joe about his behavior. Instead, she decided she’d keep behind the reception counter when Joe came to visit. And the next time she saw Joe, she mentioned her boyfriend. After that, Joe stopped making comments, although he’s still an active client at the practice.

It’s likely that there’s nothing Lisa could have done to avoid Joe’s unflattering attention. But you can reduce your risk of facing a harassing situation using this advice from Harleen Kahlon, CEO and founder of DamselsInSuccess.com, a networking site for professional women. While Kahlon stresses harassing behavior is never acceptable, she says there are some simple steps women can take to head off inappropriate behavior.

Don’t flirt. “Behavior like flirtation and touching isn’t acceptable in the workplace,” says Kahlon, a Yale Law graduate who often speaks about sexual harassment. “We’re all human, and it’s hard for people to walk through the doors at work every morning and say, ‘There are things I do out there that I can’t do in here.’ The workplace is supposed to be a gender neutral zone, and it’s tough for people to turn off their normal impulses.”

And remember, even if you do flirt at work, it doesn’t mean you deserve to be harassed. While you can sometimes reduce your risk of harassment, there are some incidents you can’t prevent.

Behave professionally. “I think every woman needs to learn the art of being warm and friendly in a professional manner,” Kahlon says. “There’s a way to behave that demonstrates you’re not to be messed with while still being someone others can confide in—with boundaries. It’s an art, and it’s tough to master.”
Acting professional also means dressing the part, so it may be time to take a quick stroll through your wardrobe and edit your work attire. “The way women dress has always been something that’s been held against them in these situations,” Kahlon says. “If you want credibility, start by dressing professionally.”

Avoid sexual language. “Don’t give the impression you have the stomach for sexual comments by engaging in banter,” she says. She recommends excusing yourself politely when conversations turn sexual, so co-workers perceive you don’t joke around about these topics. And if the situation becomes a problem—persistent and uncomfortable—you may need to complain to demonstrate you won’t tolerate that behavior.

Remember, they’re not your family.
“We would all like to work in a place where it feels like our co-workers are family. That’s a great feeling,” she says. “But it’s always a risk to become that close with your colleagues. Your job is ultimately the place you go to earn a living, not a place you go to build personal relationships. So it’s important to exercise boundaries in the office.”

The big-mouthed doctor
The comments started after Erin, a technician, had a minor conflict with Dr. Anderson, a female doctor at a large practice in Seattle. Erin is gay, and she enjoys the freedom of sharing this information with friends and colleagues she trusts. Dr. Anderson knew about Erin’s sexual orientation. Always a bit of a gossip, Dr. Anderson started sharing Erin’s private life with the public.
A day after their tiff, Dr. Anderson was discussing manicures with a co-worker. Noticing Erin, Dr. Anderson said to her, “Oh, I guess you’re not into that, are you?” Erin avoided the questioning look from the co-worker and went back to work. Later that day, a new male extern joined the practice. Tall, blond, and muscular, he immediately drew the attention of several women in the practice, and they gathered to talk about him.

Dr. Anderson, who was standing next to Erin, turned and said, “Well, I guess he really isn’t your type, is he?” The other team members overheard, and suddenly Erin found herself the center of attention. “What does she mean?” one of the women asked Erin. That’s when Dr. Anderson announced to the group that Erin only dated women.

The news spread throughout the practice, and by the end of the week, Erin was barraged with gay jokes and uncomfortable comments. Erin decided she couldn’t work in the practice any longer and took a new job at a different hospital soon afterward. Erin’s story illustrates an important fact: Woman are harassers, too. And harassment can come from a variety of different sources—from bosses, from clients, and from colleagues.

So what do you do when you face harassment? This is a highly personal decision, and it depends on many factors, including your tolerance and the severity of the harassment.

“I think it’s wise to let one or two comments go, if they’re not really aggressive,” Kahlon says. “If your boss just calls you ‘hon’ once or twice, but not all of the time, you might write it off as an oversight.” However, she adds, if you’re really uncomfortable, it’s time to complain. So what are your options?

Confront the harasser. You might simply confront the person who’s making you uncomfortable and let him or her know how you feel. “You might say, ‘Hey, I want to talk to you about something, and I don’t want to make you uncomfortable, but sometimes when you make these comments, I feel weird,’” Kahlon says.

Leave your job. “Each person has to decide, ‘How much does this position matter to me, and what are the opportunities for me at this practice once I complain?’” Kahlon says.

Submit a formal complaint. “Under the law, you must allow your employer to investigate the claim and launch corrective action,” says Jack Tuckner, co-founder of Tuckner, Sipser, Weinstock and Sipser LLP, a law firm dedicated to women’s rights in the workplace advocacy in New York. “And sometimes they do the right thing.”

If your boss refuses to address the situation, you’ll need to decide whether you want to continue managing the situation, seek a new job, or consider legal action. Much like Anna, many women are afraid to pursue legal action because they fear the lawsuit will follow them long after they’ve left their employer. So how do you decide whether it’s time to pursue legal action?
“You don’t file a lawsuit until you’ve given an employer a chance to respond and they fail to respond,” Tuckner says. “First you must file a complaint formally in a provable fashion.”

The truth about lawsuits

Lawsuits take a long time. They’re miserable for everyone. And often, the victim faces public scrutiny that can range from uncomfortable to sheer humiliation.

Tuckner knows this firsthand. As an employment law attorney, most of his cases involve gender-based workplace issues. And he’s successfully settled a case involving a veterinary assistant we’ll call Julie.

Julie was attending veterinary technology school and working as an assistant. Jim, a kennel attendant, constantly bothered Julie, asking her out on dates and telling Julie what a stud he was. Julie went to Tuckner for help.

“I told her, ‘You don’t have a case yet,’” Tuckner says. “I asked her, ‘Have you told him you’re not interested?’”

“Yes,” Julie said. “It doesn’t work. He calls me a lesbian or a bitch. He tells me all I need is one night with him and I’ll be a new woman.”

Tuckner sent Julie back to her practice with this advice: Tape record the conversations—a legal act in New York—and complain in writing to the practice owner, a veterinarian we’ll call Dr. Jones. When Julie approached Dr. Jones, he was angry and dismissive. Why couldn’t Julie just go along to get along? Julie explained she had a tape recording of the incident. Dr. Jones agreed to listen to the tape at home. A few days later he returned a broken tape to Julie. He told Julie he’d listened to the tape, and he’d shared it with his wife and a family member who was an attorney. They agreed that the conversation wasn’t harassment, and Dr. Jones blamed Julie for the behavior, claiming she encouraged Jim’s remarks.

That’s when Tuckner came in. He sent a letter to Dr. Jones informing the doctor he was representing Julie. When Dr. Jones read the letter, he fired Julie. “So once he fired her—within weeks, in fact, of her fling a complaint—she had a classic sexual harassment and retaliation case,” Tuckner says.

When Tuckner learned of Julie’s dismissal, he wrote to the doctor again to try to negotiate a resolution. “All I was trying to do at this point was to make sure the women who came after her wouldn’t have to go through this and get her a nice little settlement,” Tuckner says. “Settlements under these circumstances are often modest. At the time it might have been a several month’s severance pay to tide her over while she looked for a new job.” Dr. Jones’ response to Tuckner: “Drop dead. We’ll never pay you.” Tuckner immediately fled a complaint in state court. Five years later the case finally went to trial. In the middle of the trial, Dr. Jones agreed to settle. The settlement wasn’t resolved for another two years, but finally Julie received compensation—roughly five years’ pay.

Julie’s case is unusual. Most cases don’t make it to trial, and it’s rare to see such a large settlement, but other aspects of the case offer a bird’s-eye view into the process of litigation. Here’s a look at what you must do if you decide to pursue a lawsuit.

Know the law. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states an employer must employ at least 15 employees for the employee to file a sexual harassment claim under federal law. Some cities and states have different requirements—for example in New York, the employer must employ at least four employees for the employee to have legal recourse in state court. Julie couldn’t file a com-plaint with the EEOC, the government agency that reviews all complaints before they go to federal court, because her practice owner employed fewer than 15 people. But she was protected under her city’s and state’s law.

Keep records.
“It’s important to keep a running log of the behavior you’re dealing with,” Kahlon says. “Because if, God forbid, you end up being fired over this and you want to receive back pay or pursue this legally, you’re not going to remember every little thing the harasser said. Second, it reinforces your credibility. Your attorney or arbitrator will be more likely to believe your recollection because you wrote it down.”

Tuckner agrees. “You’re the one who has to show that there was something about your employment or the termination that was discriminatory,” he says.

Submit a formal complaint. Legal experts agree you must complain about the behavior—and a written complaint is preferred. In fact, Tuckner suggests sending the letter certified mail, return receipt requested, or by courier service, such as United Parcel Service, Federal Express, or Priority mail, so you have proof of receipt. And it’s also critical to record the dates and details of the harassing behavior. Courts are much more likely to believe you if you can provide specific details about the incidents you experienced, and writing them down shows you’re not just relying on what you remember. “In most sexual harassment situations, the practice’s liability stems from the employer’s failure to remedy the situation,” Kahlon says. “Notice often triggers your boss’s obligation.”

Don’t quit.
“Quit is a four-letter word in plaintiff’s employment law circles,” Tuckner says. Save for certain special and extreme circumstances known as constructive discharge, Tuckner says you must first file a formal complaint notifying your employer of your belief that you’re being sexually harassed. You want to demonstrate you’ve given the employer ample opportunity to remedy the situation, and he or she failed to take the appropriate action.

“I’m always upset when someone tells me, ‘Oh, by the way, I resigned two months ago and I never submitted any kind of letter of complaint,’” Tuckner says. “These situations are a long, uphill battle with no proof.”

What if you’re fired? If the firing occurs after you submitted a complaint, the courts may construe this action as retaliation, which is illegal. If you’ve been maintaining good records of the harassing behavior and the complaints you’ve fled at the practice, you offer yourself the best chance for a successful case.

Seek legal advice. Each case is different, so it’s best to seek legal advice and discuss the details of your situation with an employment lawyer. He or she can offer guidance on the appropriate action. Whichever path you choose, remember that you’re not alone. The U.S. Department of Labor predicts women will make up 48 percent of the labor force in 2008. And a poll conducted by Louis Harris and Associates shows 31 percent of female workers—and 7 percent of male workers—claim they’ve been harassed at work. Sadly, 62 percent of targets report they took no action.

“Everyone is entitled to feel comfortable at work, and if you don’t feel that way, you need to do something,” Kahlon says. “So start by talking to your boss. I know it can be awkward, especially in a small workplace, but you want to offer your employer a chance to create a safe, comfortable workplace.”

Share Women\'s Rights Blog: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Jack Tuckner’s preliminary response to the false allegations filed against him


By Jack Tuckner, Esq.

As many of you know, I have recently been viciously attacked, along with the discrimination law firm which I have co-founded, Tuckner, Sipser, Weinstock & Sipser, LLP, by a former employee, Lisa Brockington.

Ms. Brockington, the person now making these despicable and false allegations against the firm in general and me in particular, was a former client whom we aided and supported in her time of need before hiring her during her period of unemployment in December 2006. As anyone who has telephoned our firm from the moment of her hire until the day she quit would attest, Ms. Brockington only used kind and supportive words to describe my own lawyering skills, personality and deep commitment to my clients. Ms. Brockington’s own words completely undermine her present claims against me.

Her sensationalistic allegations, replete as they are with shocking and personally outrageous and destructive claims against me and this firm, are, simply stated, all lies. As a careful reading of her “story” will reveal, some of her allegations could not have actually occurred during the time period during which she worked for this firm, others are mere fantasy and pure fiction, and others are her attempt to conflate personal private, consensual behavior–of which I’ve been an outspoken champion for the entirety of my professional life–with non-existent workplace activity.

The local tabloid media reported these entirely unfounded and baseless claims against me and this firm raised by this one former disgruntled employee, yet did not feel it prudent or necessary to investigate her story in a quest for the whole truth. Did the tabloids interview any of the five female interns working at this office at the present time to determine if there was any truth to these allegations? The answer is no. There have been approximately fifty student interns and paralegals who have worked at this firm over the last five years. Did the tabloids interview any of these mostly young women to determine whether these allegations were true? Did the tabloids check with any other employees, clients or adversaries to determine whether I’m even capable of that type of conduct? Guess what the answer is? Did the tabloids ask any of the many other attorneys who work in our law suite whether they ever heard or saw anything that rose to the level of the outrageous claims contained in Lisa Brockington’s complaint? Of course not.

Everyone who knows me, from my adversaries, partner, clients, colleagues, family and friends, all understand that her allegations are baseless. While Lisa Brockington and the tabloid media have already inflicted their intended damage on me and my firm (not to mention my teenager daughters), we will aggressively contest in court the false charges contained in her complaint.

Tuckner, Sipser has always fought on behalf of people who have been wrongfully harmed. We want to assure our current and prospective clients that even in this time of challenge for our firm, we will continue to stand for the empowerment of working men and women against unlawful and discriminatory practices.

More to follow

Share Women\'s Rights Blog: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

“My reproductive rights got in the way of the mission”: Krista Errickson


Krista Errickson has refused to be a mere addition to the ever growing statistics related to pregnancy discrimination at American workplace.

Instead, she has filed a lawsuit against her former employer Faye Wattleton. Ironically, Wattleton represents a non-profit working in the sphere of women’s rights, Center for the Advancement of Women.

Jack Tuckner, who represents Ms Errickson says, “Krista’s devastation is significantly compounded by the dawning paradoxical realization that actual workplace equality is not available to women even within a progressive non-profit, and in this case, her own reproductive rights have, got in the way of the mission. She is deeply distraught and confounded.”

Click here to access the original charge of discrimination which has been filed with the EEOC.

New York Daily News reports that “Errickson is one of a growing number of women who claim they are being treated unfairly by employers simply because they are pregnant or hope to be. While working mothers have made strides in achieving a balance between their home and work lives, the number of pregnancy discrimination charges has nonetheless been rising at an alarming pace.”


Moms-to-be claim work bias
BY PHYLLIS FURMAN
DAILY NEWS BUSINESS WRITER

Monday, May 19th 2008, 4:00 AM

Executive assistant Krista Errickson had a miscarriage just weeks after starting her $85,000-a-year job.

Then, within days of returning to work at her midtown office, she was fired.

Errickson is one of a growing number of women who claim they are being treated unfairly by employers simply because they are pregnant or hope to be.

While working mothers have made strides in achieving a balance between their home and work lives, the number of pregnancy discrimination charges has nonetheless been rising at an alarming pace, according to the federal government.

And as the economy slows, pregnant employees could be on the frontline of layoffs, employment lawyers said.

“I’m seeing working mothers being given baseless performance warnings,” Manhattan attorney Miriam Clark said. “When there is a market downturn, there is a negative effect on pregnant women.”

Errickson -a 44-year-old former actress who starred years ago in the TV show “Hello, Larry” - had been working for Faye Wattleton, president of the not-for-profit Center for the Advancement of Women, when her pregnancy ended suddenly.

While recovering from her miscarriage in Pelham, N.Y., where she lives with her boyfriend, she called her boss to tell her she would be out for a few days.

Wattleton, a nationally known women’s rights advocate who previously served as president of Planned Parenthood, asked her whether she planned to try again to have kids, according to Errickson’s discrimination complaint filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Errickson said yes, adding that she’d be seeking in-vitro fertilization, a time consuming process.

Five days later, on Errickson’s first day back, Wattleton let her go, claiming Errickson had blundered by not reading her an important e-mail correctly, according to her complaint.

But Errickson insists her only fault was being a woman aiming to get pregnant.

“She fired Krista from her job because she is a woman capable of having a baby,” said Manhattan lawyer Jack Tuckner, who’s representing Errickson.

Wattleton’s lawyer, Martin Gold, called Errickson’s claim “utterly frivolous,” and noted that his client “is one of the last people on earth who would want to discriminate against a woman.”

Nonetheless, the former assistant, now working freelance jobs to make ends meet, vowed to pursue her case.

“This is a horrible blow,” Errickson said.

In the past, as troubled employers moved to shrink their ranks, some women claim bosses looked first at pregnant workers or new moms.

Nationally, pregnancy discrimination claims filed with the EEOC and state and local agencies surged last year, hitting a record high of 5,587, 14% more than 2006 and up 40% from a decade ago.

In New York City, pregnancy discrimination cases jumped 10% last year to 100, more than double the number of a decade ago.

In addition to the weak economy, complaints are rising because women are more vigilant about reporting alleged discrimination, experts said.

Just weeks ago, 54 more women joined a class-action suit filed by the EEOC against Bloomberg L.P., the financial information and media giant founded by Mayor Bloomberg.

The Bloomberg employees claim they were demoted or had their salaries reduced after disclosing their pregnancies or after returning from maternity leave.

In a statement, Judith Czelusniak, a company spokeswoman, said Bloomberg “is a global company with more than 10,000 employees in 126 offices. Since its founding in 1981, the company has employed more than 12,000 people in the United States and fewer than two dozen employment lawsuits have been filed against the company in the U.S.” Czelusniak added that, “Last month, the U.S. District Court in New Jersey dismissed an employment discrimination suit by four current and former employees, finding that the plaintiffs’ allegations were baseless. We believe that the court will render a similar judgment in the case brought by the EEOC.”

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 prohibits an employer from firing, refusing to hire or denying a promotion to a worker on the basis of pregnancy. Pregnant women must be treated the same as their peers.

“Any negative comments or actions related to your pregnancy status are illegal,” Tuckner said.

Yet, by law, women are not entitled to special treatment just because they are pregnant.

While cases of bias against pregnant women have been around as long as women have been in the workforce, lawyers say they are seeing more cases where moms who get pregnant are especially targeted.

“There is a perception that women getting pregnant the second time won’t go back,” Clark said. “She has reached the tipping point.”

Women who believe they’ve been treated unfairly have options. First, register your complaints with your company’s human resources department, said Michelle Caiola, a lawyer in the EEOC’s New York office. If the issue does not get resolved, contact the EEOC.

Most importantly, women should be aware of their rights and consider taking action if they feel their rights have been violated.

Employers “shouldn’t be making any decisions based on pregnancy,” Manhattan employment lawyer Anne Clark said.

Share Women\'s Rights Blog: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

The Price for Fair Pay

By Samantha Mc Lane

Equal Pay Day is a movement that aims for the benefit of all working women in the United States without exception. However, as incredible as it is that gender inequity still persists in this century, inequity and differences remain between races, national origin and legal status. The statistics say it: Latinas earn 52 cents for every dollar paid to white men and even less than Latin men, falling in the most underpaid group.

Why? Besides living under cultural stereotypes, people underestimating our capabilities and intelligence, difficulties in accessing benefits programs for ourselves and our family, and fear of deportation in case of illegal immigrant women. Even if we are lucky enough to get a job, why should we be receiving less salary than anybody else?

We Latinas are at the bottom of the ladder but there is the possibility to go up. We can begin by taking interest because our work, time, personal and professional projects and our lives are worthwhile. If we don´t care, no one else will.

It is a fact that to achieve the goal not only is it necessary to deconstruct cultural and systemic ideologies about women’s condition, social institutions, to question authority and the use of power, but also to take advantage of these kinds of opportunities in the legal field to strengthen equal pay laws including the Lilly Ledbetter Equal Pay Act, the Paycheck Fairness Act and the Equal Pay Act. It is an excellent opportunity to use the regulations that this country provides, thanks to the efforts of many women that have fought before, and to keep reminding and raising social awareness of this situation.

We have a voice, let´s use it to be recognized. Get informed about the actions to be done, get in contact with other women, people and groups interested in the subject, be active and demand equal payment because we have the right.

Share Women\'s Rights Blog: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Equal Pay Day

Today is being observed as Equal Pay Day (the point in 2008 when the average woman’s wages finally catch up with what the average man earned in 2007). As ceremonious as it may sound, its apt to look at the statistics once again with hope and protest.

Women in the US, working full-time, year-round earn only about 77 cents for every dollar earned by men. The median annual earnings of women ages 15 and older are $31,858, compared to $41,386 for their male counterparts. (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States)

Minority women fare significantly worse. An African American woman earns just 64 cents for every dollar earned by a white man, while a Hispanic woman earns only 52 cents on the dollar compared to her white male counterpart. The median earnings of African American women working full-time, year-round are $29,6805 compared to $46,4376 for white men; the median for Hispanic women are only $24,214. (Source: National Women’s Law Center)

One year out of college, women working full time earn only 80 percent as much as their male colleagues earn. Ten years after graduation, women fall farther behind, earning only 69 percent as much as men earn.

Likewise, Mothers are more likely than fathers (or other women) to work part time, take leave, or take a break from the work force—factors that negatively affect wages. Among women who graduated from college in 1992–93, more than one-fifth (23 percent) of mothers were out of the work force in 2003, and another 17 percent were working part time. Less than 2 percent of fathers were out of the work force in 2003, and less than 2 percent were working part time. On average, mothers earn less than women without children earn, and both groups earn less than men earn. (Source: Behind Pay Gap, 2007, AAUW)

Addressing such glaring inequalities, and highlighting the need for immediate and effective legislation to ensure fair pay, Jack Tuckner, Esq., testified at the NYC Counclil on the Need for Gender Pay Equity Legislation yesterday, which I am reproducing in full below:


I’m Jack Tuckner, of Tuckner, Sipser, Weinstock & Sipser, LLP, Women’s Rights in the Workplace Advocates. We champion the cause of working women who find themselves in some form of diminished state within their own workplaces, simply because of their gender. Women have it tougher than men. As former Presidential Candidate Shirley Chisholm famously said, “Of my two handicaps, being female put many more obstacles in my path than being black.” Pregnancy Discrimination cases are on the rise, sexual harassment and sexual abuse cases are holding their own, the glass ceiling has been replaced with steel-strength polymers and the mommy track is running all off-peak local trains to the workplace pink ghetto. Women have it tougher than men.

Last year, in Ledbetter vs. Goodyear Tire Co., our mean-spirited majority US Supreme Court scoffed at the concept of equal pay for equal work when it showed the door to Ms. Ledbetter because she had the audacity, the sheer, unseemly discourtesy, to stand up and speak out for her right to be equal. It had nothing to do with missing the statute of limitations period 16 years before when she couldn’t have possibly known of the discrimination. And the result actually encourages litigation, as every woman who senses she may be paid less than men performing equal work must dash off to file a precipitous complaint just in case her hunch proves true. The magnitude of unmitigated cynicism and misogynistic leanings that would compel that kind of harmful, tortured logic is truly impressive and hard to comprehend in the absence of malice and avarice.

Our reactionary political environment is hostile to all progressive notions of fairness, equality and equal access to justice and power. Our most esteemed judicial tribunal, the Supreme Court, is openly contemptuous of an individual citizen’s right to speak truth to power, to question authority, to hold corporaticians accountable for their excesses, if not their crimes. As a nation, we’ve morphed from a Democracy into a Corporatocracy, as BBB’s (Big Business Behemoths), aided and abetted by our corporate media, have redistributed wealth and power upward toward itself and away from us. We’re all commodities and we’re all for sale; we’ll even sell our own teenage daughters in Girls Gone Wild videos on prime-time network television. And people of color, and the GLBT community, and people with disabilities, and people in prison for using drugs unapproved by the pharmaceutical/medical complex, all have less value. And of course, women—women have less value than men. Women have lower human capital than men. Women. Our mothers, our daughters, our sisters, our wives, our girlfriends, our selves. Women consistently suffer degraded terms and conditions of employment based on sex alone and women regularly experience corporate retaliation when they do finally have their Rosa Parks moment and refuse to accept the fate chosen for them by others.

What can we do about it? We can and must insist on legally required equal treatment. We can insist that we not be objectified at work. We can insist that our leaders must care about more than profit and loss statements, and we can insist that they appoint judges who actually heed the rule of law with a view toward determining truth and fairness. Judges who would care that the legislative intent of the Equal Pay Act and Title VII was to serve the fundamental purpose of eliminating pay discrimination, as opposed to straining for reasons to deny redress as it may actually require the administration of justice. We must bring a certain male energy to the quest for remediation. We must be assertive, if not downright aggressive. To paraphrase Pulitzer winner Laura Thatcher Ulrich, “well-behaved women (and the men who admire them) rarely make history.

In our ongoing struggle for true economic parity between men and women, the laws are our weapons and the courts our battlefields. Without the weaponry of our laws, we lose all the battles and the war by default. We never even get to leave the house. We surrender to the vagaries and whimsy of those who would rule us. The two federal laws offering protection on the basis of sex, The Equal Pay Act of 1963 and The Civil Rights Act of 1964, are famously complicated statutes, requiring different standards, tests and shifting burdens. These laws confound even federal court judges let alone the average would-be Plaintiff or juror. In the Ledbetter decision, the Supreme Court has effectively eviscerated the law in its entirety, ruling that the Equal Pay Act is only available to those fleet-of-feet women who race to the courthouse door within 180 days of the first violation of the law. Never mind that the Court disingenuously rejected the fact that most women, such as Lilly Ledbetter, could not possibly have known of the pay violation when it first occurred, and the injustices not only continued unabated, but of course increased exponentially with each new paycheck violation over the many years. No justice for you, ungrateful, indelicate girl.

So, we need to enact new laws to empower working women replete with full wage disclosure elements as well as an enforcement mechanism with teeth. We need to continue to impolitely insist on our right to be paid equally and we must insist on expanded Family Responsibility legal protections so men and women may share domestic and familial responsibilities as a team. The Ledbetter decision has done considerable damage already. Roughly 175 state and federal courts have already cited the decision in cases that inflict one injustice after another on individual employees and their families, and Ledbetter was just decided 11 months ago. More government largess (and corporate welfare) for needy multinational conglomerates.

The Fair Pay Restoration Act (the Senate counterpart to The Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which has already passed the House) clarifies Congress’ original intent in Equal Pact Act cases that every unequal paycheck should count as a discriminatory act that supports a lawsuit under Title VII.

The NYS Fair Pay Act would provide workers in NY with a strong, enforceable state law to prohibit companies from paying employees less because of gender and race. The Act provides freedom of speech for all New York state employees regarding their salaries. Employees will be able to share salary information with co-workers without fear of reprisal. It also assures that in positions where women and people of color predominate, equal pay for work of equal value will be the rule of law.
Both bills routinely pass in the federal and state House and Assembly, respectively, but stall or die before the Senate. We don’t need another “study” to determine if there’s a gender pay gap. Let’s continue to use our charms and powers of persuasion to convince those within our circles of influence that it’s time for true equality. And in an expanding Corporatocracy, equality is mostly measured by the devalued US Currency that you can command.

Presented by:
Jack Tuckner, Esq.
Tuckner, Sipser, Weinstock & Sipser, LLP
Women’s Rights in the Workplace Advocacy
120 Broadway, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10271
212.766.9100
http://womensrightsny.com
jtuckner@womensrightsny.com

What happened to me is not only an insult to my dignity, but it had real consequences for my ability to care for my family. Every paycheck I received, I got less than what I was entitled to under the law. The Supreme Court said that this didn’t count as illegal discrimination, but it sure feels like discrimination when you are on the receiving end of that smaller paycheck and trying to support your family with less money than the men are getting for doing the same job. And according to the Court, if you don’t figure things out right away, the company can treat you like a second-class citizen for the rest of your career. That isn’t right. : Lilly Ledbetter

Share Women\'s Rights Blog: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Blog for Fair Pay Day

Blog for Fair Pay

The blog entry can be found here.

Share Women\'s Rights Blog: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Working Wounded: Confronting Sexual Harassment

BOB ROSNER for ABC News asks to Keep Detailed Records and Don’t Be Afraid to Make a Scene

Dear WOUNDED: A co-worker says offensive things to me daily. I just don’t know how to shut him up.

ANSWER: Harassment shouldn’t be in anyone’s job description. But before we offer strategies to address harassment, we want to tell you about the “Annoy-a-tron.” This little slice of heaven for office pranksters is a tiny circuit board that you can hide in a plant or under a desk that emits an annoying beep. Because that just wasn’t annoying enough, the beeps go off randomly, so the little bugger is really hard to find.

Sounds like you’ve got you own Annoy-a-tron at work and unfortunately, you’re not alone. According to a recent survey, sexually explicit comments in the workplace have doubled in the past year. This shouldn’t be a surprise, considering 5 of the top 10 Google searches are sexually explicit. Freedom of speech doesn’t include the right to be offensive at work. We offer strategies for confronting a harassing coworker. For more, check out “Sexual Harassment on the Job” by Bill Petrocelli and Barbara K. Repa (Nolo, 1999).

There are some steps to take before you say word one to your harasser. Find a supportive ear with your boss, human resources department or your union. Your goal should be to develop rapport with them, not to report the harasser. You’ll also want to document what happened to you with dates and details. If this situations turns into a real drama, you’ll need a detailed record of what happened.

We may refuse to confront for fear of being seen as a prude or weak or humorless or hypersensitive or a tattletale, and the list goes on. According to Petrocelli and Repa, up to 90 percent of low- to mid-level harassment stops when you directly confront the harasser. So you can often end the harassment. You shouldn’t have to struggle to get your job done because of this kind of abuse.

Your harasser may be a jerk who is trying to offend you. Or he may be someone who is unconsciously causing a problem. That’s why it’s important to communicate your displeasure.

Subtle body language probably won’t register. Humor and “I feel” statements are probably also too soft. Look him directly in the eyes, without a smile describe the specific behavior you find offensive and then ask him to stop it. His comments or actions are directly affecting you so address him just as directly.

It’s really tempting to want to publicly humiliate the offending party, but you don’t want to go there. You get to set the example of respect here. Make certain you’re away from co-workers and management when you confront a co-worker.
Read more…

Share Women\'s Rights Blog: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

Weight discrimination common, U.S. survey finds

How common is weight discrimination? Very, as a recent survey finds:

Amy Norton writes for Reuters Health - Discrimination against the overweight may be about as prevalent as racial discrimination, the results of a survey of U.S. adults suggest.

Using data from a survey of nearly 2,300 Americans, researchers at Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut found that 5 percent of men and 10 percent of women said they had faced discrimination because of their weight — ranging from job refusals to rude treatment in everyday life.

Among respondents who were severely obese — having a body mass index

(BMI) of 35 or higher — 40 percent reported instances of weight discrimination. A body mass index is the ratio between height and weight commonly used to classify individuals as over- or underweight.

Weight bias also rivaled the prevalence of other, long-recognized forms of discrimination, the researchers report in the International Journal of Obesity.

Among women, weight discrimination was the third most common form, behind sex and age discrimination. Among all adults, it came in fourth overall, after sex, age and racial discrimination.

The findings point to a need for “organized efforts” to combat weight bias, the researchers note in their report.

“In order to reduce weight bias, we need major shifts in societal attitudes,” lead researcher Dr. Rebecca M. Puhl told Reuters Health.

This would include building awareness of weight discrimination and its consequences, Puhl noted, as well as improving media portrayals of obese individuals. Overweight people should also have legal protection against discrimination, she said.

The findings are based on a nationally representative sample of 2,290 Americans ages 25 to 74 who were surveyed between 1995 and 1996.

Respondents were asked whether they had ever been victims of discrimination based on race, religion, sex or various other reasons, including weight.

Of the men and women who reported weight discrimination, 60 percent said they had experienced work-related discrimination, such as not being hired, being passed over for promotion, or being wrongly fired.

Many also cited day-to-day types of discrimination, like being treated with less respect or courtesy than others, or being “perceived as inferior.” And compared with victims of other forms of discrimination, those subjected to weight bias were more likely to say they had been called names or overtly insulted.

Women were particularly likely to perceive weight bias, with twice as many women as men reporting such discrimination.

This may not be surprising, according to Puhl, given the “stringent and unrealistic ideals of thinness that are placed on women in North America.”

Indeed, the study found that women seemed to be vulnerable to weight discrimination even if they were moderately overweight, whereas only severely obese men reported discrimination at a rate comparable with their female counterparts.

“This means we need to be especially aware of the negative experiences and effects of weight bias among females,” Puhl said.

Share Women\'s Rights Blog: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • blogmarks
  • Furl